Matboard Bridge

Matboard bridge designed to maximize strength-to-mass ratio, holding 740 N and placing 3rd in the CIV102 Bridge Design Competition.

Matboard Bridge
timeline: October - November 2024·team: Lawrence Ding, Jacky Li
tech stack: MATLAB, Python

Overview

For the culminating project of CIV102 (Structures and Materials), our team was given a single 32×40 in piece of matboard and 60 mL of contact cement to build a 1200 mm bridge capable of supporting a 400 N dynamic train load and as much additional weight as possible until failure.

The challenge was to maximize strength-to-mass ratio through iterative design and structural analysis.

How It Works

The design went through 8 iterations, using MATLAB and Python to calculate factor-of-safety (FOS) values across six failure modes: tension, compression, buckling, shear, glue shear, and shear buckling.

Key design decisions: double-layered top flange to resist compression buckling; no bottom flange (counterintuitively) because removing it improved strength-to-mass ratio; 117.5 mm web height to increase the second moment of area; 12 diaphragms (6 evenly spaced in the center, 6 clustered near supports to handle shear); offset splices staggered two-thirds of the span to prevent simultaneous joint failure; widened glue flaps for stronger adhesive bonding.

Design decisions were also shaped by consulting upper-year students who flagged torsion failure risks from overly tall decks and the importance of splice placement, insights the math alone wouldn't have surfaced.

How It Works

Results

The bridge held 740 N before failure.

Bridge mass: 719.1 g. Strength-to-mass ratio: 104.9.

Placed 1st in our cohort and 3rd overall in the 2024 CIV102 Bridge Design Competition.

Results